Control Charts

    

Manufacturing operations of technology companies employ complex processes that need to be under strict control at all times.  Controlling a process usually means maintaining its output parameters to within certain specifications by providing it with the correct set of inputs.  Unfortunately, keeping the process inputs within their defined specifications is not often enough to ensure that the output will always be good. Other factors that were not initially considered in the design of the process can come into play and degrade the performance of the process, even if the inputs to the process follow the specifications. 

     

Control charting is a technique for monitoring the performance of the process for any signs of deterioration, so that actions may be taken before the process gets out of control. This technique consists of plotting critical process output parameters on control charts at defined intervals, and analyzing the trends exhibited by the plots for any abnormalities that need intervention.

       

A control chart is used:  1) for presenting process performance in a quick and easy-to-use visual format; 2) for monitoring process variation over time; 3) for distinguishing out-of-control points due to special assignable causes from variations due to common causes that are part of the process;  4) for detecting abnormal trends and other tell-tale signs of process anomaly; 5) as feedback for processes that are undergoing improvements; and 6) as a common language for discussing process performance. 

       

Control charting can not be applied to every process though.  It can only be implemented for processes that are already stable, and whose output data for charting constitute a normal distribution.  A stable process is one whose output data form a distribution with low variation, i.e., the data have a low standard deviation. On the other hand, an unstable process exhibits very large variation, i.e., the output data have a high standard deviation.

      

The high variation of an immature or unstable process is usually due to a number of extremely high or extremely low points (known as out-of-control points or outliers) caused by special random causes that are not part of the process itself. Such factors must be minimized (if not eliminated) first, to yield output data that truly reflect the inherent capability of the process, before control charting is started.  Doing so will ensure that the process under control charting exhibits variation caused only by factors that are part of the process itself.

        

There are many types of control charts for both attribute and variable types of data.  However, the control chart used for individual readings of variable data will be used in the following discussions since it is one of the most extensively  used control charts in process engineering.

       

A completed control chart has the following parts: 1) an x-axis that shows the points at which the parameter readings were collected; 2) a y-axis that shows the parameter reading for each data collection point on the x-axis; 3) a horizontal data average or process mean line; 4) horizontal line(s) for the control limit(s); 5) horizontal line(s) for the specification limit(s); 5) a horizontal target line lying exactly between the specification limit lines; and 6) the plotted data.  Figure 1 shows an example of a completed control chart.

     

Figure 1. Example of a complete control chart

       

To implement control charting for a given process, the following steps are usually taken:

    

1) identify the process and/or equipment to be subjected to control charting;

      

2) identify the process output parameter to be charted;

     

3) check the chosen parameter's data if they constitute a normal distribution;

      

4) determine the sampling method and plan;

     

5) construct the preliminary control chart indicating just the upper and lower specification limits of the process;

       

6) conduct the preliminary data collection to gather baseline data upon which the characteristics of the control chart will be based;

     

7) calculate the appropriate statistics and the control limits of the chart from the initial data collected;

   

8) complete the control chart by including the process mean and control limit lines; and

   

9) initiate the actual control charting.

                    

The premise of control charting is that the output data charted constitute a normal distribution, which is a symmetrical bell-shaped distribution described by two numbers: its center (the mean of the data) and its spread.  The spread of a normal distribution on the left of its center is equal to that on the right.  For the purpose of control charting, this spread on either side is equal to 3 standard deviations, such that data falling outside 3 standard deviations on either side are considered outliers.

     

Thus, referring to Figure 1 again, the process mean line of a control chart is a horizontal line whose y-coordinate is equal to the mean of the charted data. The upper/lower control limit lines (UCL and LCL) are the horizontal lines whose y-coordinates are equal to the mean of the charted data plus/minus 3 times the standard deviation of the charted data, respectively, or: UCL = Mean + 3 Stdev and LCL = Mean - 3 Stdev.  Note that the process mean line is exactly between the control limit lines.

     

In further reference to Figure 1, the lines for the upper and lower specification limits (USL and LSL) of the control charts are simply the horizontal lines whose y-coordinates are equal to the maximum and minimum output data allowed by the process (oftentimes the customer specifications), while the target line is the horizontal line exactly between these two specification limit lines.      

             

Interpretation of control charts is not difficult.  However, the engineer has to be aware of the common guidelines used in control chart interpretation. Some 'symptoms' that indicate that a process is out of control are:  1) one or more points are outside the control limits; 2) nine (9) consecutive points are on one side of the average; 3) six (6) consecutive points are increasing or decreasing; and 4) fourteen (14) consecutive points are alternating up and down.  If any of these out-of-control symptoms are observed, the engineer has to initiate an out-of-control process investigation.

 

See Also:  SPC

 

HOME

      

Copyright 2004-2005 SiliconFarEast.com. All Rights Reserved.